Zeitgeist -Federal Reserve Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Zeitgeist - Federal Reserve - Essay Example Another law was passed in 1913, which was the government annual duty, where 35% of your pay is paid to the obligations from the Federal Reserve Bank. In any case, the film expresses that there are no laws that command you to settle this expense. War and broad communications are likewise different methods in picking up benefit by these worldwide banks and the Federal Reserve. They advance cash, with enthusiasm to nations associated with war. Broad communications is utilized to engage the general public and letting them center around things that are not fundamental; in this way, permitting notable individuals to do anything they desire. In the start of the video, it was expressed that the American Revolutionary War started in 1775. The film uncovered that the said insurgency was brought about by King George III when he pronounced to confine the settlements to work in their own autonomous cash framework, convincing them to acquire assets from the Central Bank of England, which results to their quick obligations. Part 6- - A People in Revolution mentions to us what had occurred in the American War for Independence over Great Britain (Nash et al. 167). I picked this section in light of the fact that the said war was the consequence of England’s refusal to let its settlements have a fair cash framework. As such, the war was a move by American individuals to escape from the colonization of Great Britain and to be liberated from the cash controllers. America won the war; be that as it may, the journey over the idea of focal banking had just barely started. Alongside the dread and control infused by these individuals, various associations will be and are built up to make a one world government that will rule over each part of a person’s life. In any case, the film expresses that you have a decision between partaking in the framework or to make a world unafraid however brimming with affection. Then again, the substance of the film is disturbing. The film suggests that there are government frameworks that should be

Views of Christianity and Islam Towards Trade

Christianity and Islam are two of the most drilled religions on the planet, and have been for a considerable length of time. These two religions are both monotheistic, which implies they adore one God, or Allah. Begun once again 2000 years back, Christianity depends on the lessons and life of Jesus Christ and was spread all through the Roman Empire. The religion of Islam started from the get-go in 600 C. E. by the prophet Muhammad, and he spread the news of Allah. These religions spread rapidly in Europe and the Middle East. As they advanced, new exchanging courses came to fruition in these areas.Overtime, Christianity and Islam created assessments about the exchanging and organizations action and the individuals who sought after it. As indicated by the religion’s sacred books, the Bible and Qur’an, their perspectives on exchange were diverse from the outset. Christians accepted that individuals ought not exchange; for it was not the quest for man. Muslims were signific antly more lenient of exchange, as long as dealers were straightforward in their bartering. By 1000 C. E, both the religions’ perspectives towards exchange had changed totally. Christian researchers started to train that fair exchange was adequate, while Muslim researchers saw the peril that exchange brought to a man’s soul.By the fifteenth century, perspectives towards exchange had much progressively intense change by and by. Christianity upheld that exchange was supported and commendable, while Muslims accepted shippers were degenerate. At the point when the two religions initially started, Christianity and Islam varied from the outset on their perspectives concerning exchange. As expressed in the Christian Bible, it is practically outlandish for a rich man to enter the realm of God (archive 1). For Christians, from the outset they needed to carry on with an unassuming existence without making any profits.Its said that it was simpler for a camel to experience the ape rture of a needle, than for a rich man to go into the realm of God. With respect to Muslims this contrasted in light of the fact that in the Qur’an, men were permitted to exchange as long as they were straightforward; said in report 2. â€Å"If the two gatherings talk reality and make it show, their exchange will be honored, and in the event that they cover and tell and untruth, the gift of their exchange will be pulverized. † This implies in the event that two individuals exchange decently among one another without cheating, at that point nothing isn't right as indicated by the Islam beliefs.If one of the men are cheated, at that point their business will be cleared out. The purpose of record 1 was that Jesus was a poor man, in this manner his adherents satisfied being poor too. At the point when Christianity began, Christians accepted that so as to go to paradise, they should carry on with a poor and humble life, similar to Jesus did. A similar rationale applies for Muslims in archive 2, who’s author Muhammed was a rich vendor. In record two, the creator is supporting shippers and saying that they will be acknowledged by Allah as long as they are truthful.Muslims unequivocally accepted that it was alright to be a well off trader as long you are straightforward, as Muhammed. Accordingly, the two religions were from the outset diverse in light of the fact that Christianity had negative perspectives toward exchange while Islam was for it; and they were similar on the grounds that the explanation behind their perspectives both followed back to their authors. In reports four and five, the view purposes of Christians and Muslims toward exchange started to change. Christians, who were from the outset against exchange and getting well off from it, presently state that it is alright to exchange as long as you are honest.Stated in report four, â€Å"No man should offer a thing to another man for more than its value. † This is stating that f or men to work with each other, they should not sell things for more than they are worth, or as it were trick one another. While Christian researchers are getting more tolerant towards exchange than they were the point at which the religion began, Islamic researchers are getting increasingly exacting. Muslims currently accept that selling things for a benefit, regardless of whether it is straightforward, is unavoidably influencing the spirit. â€Å"These characteristics lead to an abatement and debilitating in uprightness and manliness,† (report five).The Islam look on exchange currently observes that the strategies that exchange utilizes are stunts planned for making a benefit by making sure about the distinction among purchasing and selling costs. The two religions, be that as it may, are still to some degree comparative since the two of them accept that exchanging for huge benefits can inevitably prompt defilement of the spirit. Perspectives on exchange by Christians and M uslims yet kept on changing considerably further in archives six and seven. It appears in archive six as though Christians were being urged to exchange as long as it included God.Religious compositions of Our Lady were being requested, along these lines Christians currently need individuals to exchange. Likewise in report six it is expressed that, â€Å"You realize God has allowed you to procure incredible wealth in this world, may He be applauded. † It is presently expected for Christian shippers to exchange and use God at the same time. Extra time you can see the change on the perspectives on exchange, in light of the fact that from the start Christians didn't need anybody making a huge benefit. With respect to Muslims, shippers are loosing cash from exchanging. In record seven, Sakaoglu Nasuh is a case of how after some time the trade action has influenced his moral traditions. The previously mentioned has now acted in opposition to the old custom. † This is on the g rounds that he is purchasing all the cotton yarn and selling them at greater expenses. Consequently, not giving different traders a reasonable chance to purchase and sell the cotton too. This is conflicting with what the Islam religion accepted, which is business exercises are satisfactory as long as you are not exploiting others. The Islamic Court most likely said this is report seven since they needed to satisfy the individuals and let them realize that shippers must obey.The two religions keep on varying in these archives since Christians are presently convincing individuals to exchange, while Islam exchanging is turning out to be hoarded. Be that as it may, Christianity and Islam are still similar in which the two of them use religion for instance. The mentalities of Christianity and Islam towards exchange and shippers varied. At the point when the two religions initially started, they had inverse perspectives from one another. Christians considered exchange to be riches as bein g a long way from God and it was not affirmed. Muslims, then again, endured exchange as long as the two gatherings were straightforward and nobody was exploited of.Later on, these perspectives changed when Christians turned out to be progressively tolerant and furthermore acknowledged fair exchange. Muslims at that point considered exchange to be definitely influencing the spirit when vendors got degenerate by outbidding different traders. Nonetheless, we would require extra reports, for example, records from the average folks so as to asses the outcomes of the dealer exercises. We don't have the foggiest idea how the Christians’ or Muslims’ average people saw the exchanging business, subsequently, we can't completely see all parts of the religions towards it.

Meth Mouth The Effects of Methamphetamines on Teeth

Meth Mouth The Effects of Methamphetamines on Teeth Addiction Drug Use Meth Print The Effects of Methamphetamines on Dental Health By Tammy Davenport  Tammy Davenport is a dental assistant with experience on the clinical and administrative side. Learn about our editorial policy Tammy Davenport Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 08, 2019 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on February 23, 2020  Daniel Kaesler / EyeEm  / Getty Images More in Addiction Drug Use Meth Cocaine Heroin Marijuana Ecstasy/MDMA Hallucinogens Opioids Prescription Medications Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Nicotine Use Coping and Recovery Methamphetamine, also known simply as meth, is a strong stimulant street drug thats highly addictive. The use of methamphetamines can cause serious health issues, including severe and highly visible problems with the mouth and teeth. In fact, the association between methamphetamine use and dental disease has become so popularized in media that its been given its own epithet: meth mouth.?? What Is Meth Mouth? “Meth mouth” is a term used to describe the visible effects of oral disease in a person who uses methamphetamine because of the rampant tooth decay that often occurs with the drugs use. People who use methamphetamine may have blackened, stained, broken, or rotting teeth both as a result of side effects of the drug itself and related lifestyle factors.?? While meth mouth is not a clinical diagnosis, according to the American Dental Association, there is a high rate of both dental decay and periodontal disease among people who use methamphetamine. Results of a study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association found, in a group of 571 methamphetamine users:?? 96% had tooth decay31% were missing 6 or more teethOnly 23% had all of their natural teeth6% of older meth users had fewer than 10 teeth40% admitted that they were embarrassed about their dental appearance How Meth Can Damage Your Mouth Methamphetamine use damages dental health in several ways:?? Poor diet: Under the influence of meth and often during withdrawal, people often experience cravings for sugary foods and carbonated beverages, which are bad for teeth.Lack of dental hygiene: The meth high can last up to 12 hours, during which time users often do not practice good dental hygiene such as brushing or flossing, which leave the sugary substances on their teeth for long periods of time.Drug additives: The acidic contents of this drug can also damage teeth. Additives can include battery acid, lantern fuel, antifreeze, hydrochloric acid, drain cleaner, lye, and over-the-counter cold medications containing ephedrine.Bruxism: Methamphetamine use can lead to the development of bruxism, a condition in which people clench and/or grind their teeth.Xerostomia: Stimulant use, including meth, can also lead to xerostomia, or dry mouth, reducing protective saliva around the teeth. Can Meth Mouth Be Reversed? A study of people who use meth in China found that more than 97% had decayed teeth, but prevalence of decay was lower among those who used meth for fewer years and those who brushed their teeth at least twice per day.?? But even when practicing good dental hygiene, its difficult to prevent the dental damage that often occurs with meth use. And while less serious cases of tooth decay can be treated, it cant be reversed. In fact, using methamphetamine can cause decay to the extent that the teeth cannot be saved and must be pulled instead. Unfortunately, there is not much that a dentist can do for a patient with meth mouth and successful treatment usually includes tooth extraction rather than reversal of the oral disease. Ultimately, the best course of treatment for someone living with oral disease caused by meth use is to treat the addiction. The dentist may choose to educate patients on the effects of the drug and offer resources such as drug counseling services. Treating meth addiction is usually a long, ongoing process that requires medical detox along with ongoing therapy and social support to prevent a relapse. A Word From Verywell The physical appearance meth mouth is often shocking, and studies have shown that people who experience it are self-conscious about their appearance.?? Unfortunately, dental disease is but one of the health problems associated with methamphetamine use. If you or a loved one suffers from meth addiction, talk to a doctor, therapist, or attend a support group. Help is available, but its important for you to take the first step and ask for it. Methamphetamine: Everything You’ve Been Afraid to Ask

Zimmermann Telegram in World War I

The Zimmermann Telegram was a diplomatic note sent by the German Foreign Office to Mexico in January 1917 which proposed a military alliance between the two nations should the United States enter World War I (1914-1918) on the side of the Allies. In return for the alliance, Mexico would receive financial assistance from Germany as well as could reclaim territory lost during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) (1846-1848). The Zimmermann Telegram was intercepted and decoded by the British who in turn shared it with the United States. The release of the telegram in March further inflamed the American public and contributed to the American declaration of war the following month. Background In 1917, As World War I ground on, Germany began assessing options for striking a decisive blow. Unable to break the British blockade of the North Sea with its surface fleet, the German leadership elected to return to a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare. This approach, whereby German U-boats would attack merchant shipping without warning, had been briefly used in 1916 but was abandoned after strong protests by the United States. Believing that Britain could be quickly crippled if its supply lines to North America were severed, Germany prepared to re-implement this approach effective February 1, 1917. Concerned that the resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare could bring the United States into the war on the side of the Allies, Germany began making contingency plans for this possibility. To this end, German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann was instructed to seek a military alliance with Mexico in the event of war with the United States. In return for attacking the United States, Mexico was promised the return of territory lost during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), including Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona, as well as substantial financial assistance. German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann. Public Domain Transmission As Germany lacked a direct telegraph line to North America, the Zimmermann Telegram was transmitted over American and British lines. This was permitted as President Woodrow Wilson allowed the Germans to transmit under the cover of U.S. diplomatic traffic in hopes that he could remain in touch with Berlin and broker a lasting peace. Zimmermann sent the original coded message to Ambassador Johann von Bernstorff on January 16, 1917. Receiving the telegram, he forwarded it on to Ambassador Heinrich von Eckardt in Mexico City via commercial telegraph three days later. Mexican Response After reading the message, von Eckardt approached the government of President Venustiano Carranza with the terms. He also asked Carranza to aid in forming an alliance between Germany and Japan. Listening to the German proposal, Carranza instructed his military to determine the feasibility of the offer. In assessing a possible war with the United States, the military determined that it largely lacked the capability to re-take the lost territories and that German financial assistance would be useless as the United States was the only significant arms producer in the Western Hemisphere. President Venustiano Carranza of Mexico. Public Domain Furthermore, additional arms could not be imported as the British controlled the sea lanes from Europe. As Mexico was emerging from a recent civil war, Carranza sought to improve relations with the United States as well as other nations in the region such as Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. As a result, it was determined to decline the German offer. An official response was issued to Berlin on April 14, 1917, stating that Mexico had no interest in allying with the German cause. British Interception As the ciphertext of the telegram was transmitted through Britain, it was immediately intercepted by British code breakers who were monitoring traffic originating in Germany. Sent to the Admiraltys Room 40, code breakers found that it was encrypted in cipher 0075, which they had partially broken. Decoding parts of the message, they were able to develop an outline of its content. Realizing that they possessed a document that could compel the United State to join the Allies, the British set about developing a plan that would allow them to unveil the telegram without giving away that they were reading neutral diplomatic traffic or that they had broken German codes. To deal with the first issue, they were able to correctly guess that the telegram was sent over commercial wires from Washington to Mexico City. In Mexico, British agents were able to obtain a copy of the ciphertext from the telegraph office. This was encrypted in cipher 13040, which the British had captured a copy of in the Middle East. As a result, by mid-February, British authorities had the complete text of the telegram. To deal with the code breaking issue, the British publicly lied and claimed they had been able to steal a decoded copy of the telegram in Mexico. They ultimately alerted the Americans to their code breaking efforts and Washington elected to back the British cover story. On February 19, 1917, Admiral Sir William Hall, the head of Room 40, presented a copy of the telegram to the secretary of the U.S. Embassy, Edward Bell.​​ Stunned, Hall initially believed the telegram to be a forgery but passed it on to Ambassador Walter Hines Page the next day. On February 23, Page met with Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour and was shown the original ciphertext as well as the message in both German and English. The next day, the telegram and verifying details were presented to Wilson. Ambassador Walter Hines Page. Library of Congress American Response News of the Zimmermann Telegram was quickly released and stories about its contents appeared in the American press on March 1. While pro-German and anti-war groups claimed that it was a forgery, Zimmermann confirmed the telegrams contents on March 3 and March 29. Further inflaming the American public, which was angered over the resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare (Wilson broke diplomatic relations with Germany on February 3 over this issue) and the sinking SS Houstonic (February 3) and SS California (February 7), the telegram further pushed the nation towards war. On April 2, Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany. This was granted four days later and the United States entered the conflict. Zimmermann Telegram in World War I The Zimmermann Telegram was a note sent in 1917 from the German Foreign Minister Zimmermann to his ambassador in Mexico, containing details of a proposed alliance against America; it was intercepted and published, strengthening US public support for war against Germany as part of World War One. The Background By 1917 the conflict we call The First World War had been raging for over two years, drawing in troops from Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, and Australasia, although the main battles were in Europe. The main belligerents were, on one side, the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires (the Central Powers) and, on the other, the British, French and Russian Empires (the Entente or Allies). The war had been expected to last just a few months in 1914, but the conflict had dragged on in a stalemate of trenches and massive death tolls, and all sides in the war were looking for any advantage they could gain. The Zimmermann Telegram Sent through a supposedly secure channel devoted to peace negotiations (a transatlantic cable belonging to Scandinavia) on January 19th, 1917, the Zimmermann Telegram – often called the Zimmermann Note — was a memo sent from the German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German Ambassador to Mexico. It informed the ambassador that Germany would be resuming its policy of Unrestricted Submarine Warfare (USW) and, crucially, ordered him to propose an alliance. If Mexico would join in a war against the US, they would be rewarded with financial support and re-conquered land in New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona. The ambassador was also to ask the Mexican President to propose his own alliance to Japan, a member of the Allies. Why Did Germany Send the Zimmermann Telegram? Germany had already stopped and started USW — a program of sinking any shipping coming near their enemies in an attempt to starve them of food and materials — because of fierce US opposition. Americas official neutrality involved trading with all belligerents, but in practice, this meant the Allies and their Atlantic coastlines rather than Germany, who suffered from a British blockade. Consequently, US shipping was frequently a victim. In practice, the US was giving the UK aid which had prolonged the war. The German high command knew renewed USW would probably cause the US to declare war on them, but they gambled on shutting Britain down before an American army could arrive in force. The alliance with Mexico and Japan, as proposed in the Zimmermann Telegram, was intended to create a new Pacific and Central American Front, greatly distracting the US and aiding the German war effort. Indeed, after USW resumed the US severed diplomatic relations with Germany and began debating an entry into the war. The Leak However, the secure channel wasnt secure at all: British intelligence intercepted the telegram and, recognizing the effect it would have on US public opinion, released it to America on February 24th, 1917. Some accounts claim the US State Department was also illegally monitoring the channel; either way, US President Wilson saw the note on the 24th. It was released to the world press on March 1st. Reactions to the Zimmermann Telegram Mexico and Japan immediately denied having anything to do with the proposals (indeed, the Mexican President was content at a recent American withdrawal from his country and Germany could offer little beyond moral support), while Zimmermann admitted the Telegrams authenticity on March 3rd. It had often been asked why Zimmermann came right out and fully admitted things instead of pretending otherwise. Despite Germanys complaint that the Allies had been wiretapping secure peace networks, the US public — still concerned at Mexicos intentions following trouble between the two — was aghast. A vast majority reacted to both the Note, and weeks of growing anger at USW, by backing war against Germany. However, the note itself did not provoke the US into joining the war. Things might have stayed as they were, but then Germany made the mistake which cost them the war and restarted Unrestricted Submarine Warfare again. When the American Congress approved Wilsons decision to declare war on April 6th in reaction to this, there was just 1 vote against. Full Text of The Zimmermann Telegram On the first of February, we intend to begin submarine warfare unrestricted. In spite of this, it is our intention to endeavor to keep neutral the United States of America. If this attempt is not successful, we propose an alliance on the following basis with Mexico: That we shall make war together and together make peace. We shall give general financial support, and it is understood that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona. The details are left to you for settlement. You are instructed to inform the President of Mexico of the above in the greatest confidence as soon as it is certain that there will be an outbreak of war with the United States and suggest that the President of Mexico, on his own initiative, should communicate with Japan suggesting adherence at once to this plan; at the same time, offer to mediate between Germany and Japan. Please call to the attention of the President of Mexico that the employment of ruthless submarine warfare now promises to compel England to make peace in a few months. Zimmerman (Sent January 19, 1917)

The Shift of Culture in Compton and the Transcendent...

In less than forty years, the city of Compton went from a shielded suburb near the confines of Los Angeles, to a terrorizing image of American culture. The results of this transformation and creation of â€Å"gangsta rap† is still well renowned today. Through de jure segregation, Reagan economics, undermining of black prosperity, N.W.A., and â€Å"Boyz n the Hood†, the city of Compton told its story and became a global image. This paper will analyze the shift of culture in Compton and the transcendent cultural effect it formed in America. Thousands of migrants in the 1920’s - 1950’s envisioned Compton, California as the perfect place to settle down and ideal center for industrial workers. That vision did come true for white Americans, although it†¦show more content†¦This was a unique case in African American history and one of the most compelling stories of Compton in my opinion. Blacks were predominant in a suburban setting for one of the few t imes in history. There was a very short window of overlapping segregation and black prosperity in the United States, but Compton fulfilled that window. Black students did well in Compton and Compton Community College became an excellent choice of education. During this time the first black mayor and councilmen were elected. African Americans were beginning to break social barriers in Compton. Compton took its most critical hit when deindustrialization struck. Manufactures followed other industries in seeking to lower their tax burden, open new markets, and increase their plant size. With more than one-third of Compton’s population employed in manufacturing, the city broke its social and economic threshold. The backlash stemmed from an increase in gang and drug related activities. The aging middle-class was increasingly outnumbered by a troubled youth. Children, who were once encouraged by their parents’ success, were now hanging their heads. By 1970 the Bloods and the Crips were created right outside of Compton. The â€Å"crack explosion† of the 1980’s only intensified crime, violence, and murder rates. From middle-class to neighborhood terror, the prosperity relinquished by African Americans in Compton had promptly crumbled right in front of everyone’s eyes. The issues created during this

Was Alfred Hitchcock a Misogynist Free Essays

Of course Alfred Hitchcock was a misogynist, or at least had a neurotic compulsion to mistreat women in his films: everyone knows that. Or do they? If so, one must assume also that most of his heroines were masochistic, in that nearly all his leading actresses seem to have adored him. And if there was mistreatment, it mostly seems to have been meted out, and perceived by its apparent victims, as all in the spirit of innocent merriment. We will write a custom essay sample on Was Alfred Hitchcock a Misogynist or any similar topic only for you Order Now Ivor Montagu, longtime friend and script collaborator of Hitch, told me that one of the first famous examples, the ordeals undergone by Madeleine Carroll while handcuffed to Robert Donat in The 39 Steps, arose because he and Hitch had known her before she went off to Hollywood as very much one of the lads, and suspected she might need to be jollied out of any Hollywood big-star nonsense. And, moreover, that she gave as good as she got, involving Hitch in succession of practical jokes. Well, what about that snippet of sound test for Anny Ondra in Blackmail, in which he reduces her to helpless giggles with a couple of off-colour jokes?Subject to passionate feminist condemnation, it yet seems to be perceived by both participants as whimsically flirtatious, and Ondra and her husband, the boxer Max Schmelling, remained close friends of Hitch’s for the rest of their lives. True, there appears to be little fun in Tippi Hedren’s ordeal in the attic with the birds, but then that arises inevitably from the dramatic situation in the film. And even Hedren, despite her quarrels with Hitchcock over his more-than-professional possessiveness, had no complaints about the support he normally gave her. In his private and professional lives Hitchcock was always surrounded by women. He and his wife had just one child, a daughter, and she produced three grandchildren, all daughters. But where choice was available, in his professional dealings, his office was entirely staffed by women. There was a succession of female personal assistants, as well as the usual complement of secretaries, and his wife Alma was always his most professional, as well as personal, assistant of all. An experienced film editor when he was mainly making the tea, she was always appealed to as the ltimate authority in the cutting room. When the composer Bernard Herrmann first met Alma at Hitchcock’s unit office he later observed: â€Å"There will be trouble. That woman is consumed with jealousy. † So how had she felt about, say, Joan Harrison being Hitch’s personal assistant? For Harrison, whom Hitchcock brought over from England with him in 1939, was a cool blonde with a sizzle underneath. She launched immediately into a blazing affair with Clark Gable, while John Houseman assured me that she was never Hitchcock’s mistress – â€Å"and I can say that, because for some time she was mine†.Peggy Robertson, Hitch’s last and longest personal assistant, was the opposite: a jolly-hockey-stick kind of English lady. When she came to Hollywood she asked Hitch whether she would be expected to follow Joan as his mistress. He replied: â€Å"I can say with complete conviction that I was never between the sheets with Joan. † â€Å"Well, that’s not saying much,† said Peggy; â€Å"What about on the hearth-rug, in the haystack, over the kitchen table? † Hitch gave a convincing look of horror: â€Å"Do people really do thin gs like that? †The playwright Rodney Ackland, who worked with Hitchcock on the script of Number Seventeen in 1932, was exceptional in that he was openly gay. Hitch was fascinated, and once said to him: â€Å"I think I would have been a poof if I hadn’t met Alma at the right time. † An exaggerated view of his coming to terms with his feminine side? Who can say? But undeniably he was more at home with women. Happy as he might be with his leading men, they were not the ones he identified with, and for his bosom buddies you have to look entirely on the other side of the gender gap. How to cite Was Alfred Hitchcock a Misogynist, Papers

Human Cloning Isnt as Scary as It Sounds Essay Example For Students

Human Cloning Isnt as Scary as It Sounds Essay Human Cloning Isnt as Scary as It SoundsThe recent news of the successful cloning of an adult sheepin which the sheeps DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to producea lamb with identical DNAhas generated an outpouring of ethical concerns. Theseconcerns are not about Dolly, the now famous sheep, nor even about theconsiderable impact cloning may have on the animal breeding industry, but ratherabout the possibility of cloning humans. For the most part, however, the ethicalconcerns being raised are exaggerated and misplaced, because they are based onerroneous views about what genes are and what they can do. The danger, therefore,lies not in the power of the technology, but in the misunderstanding of itssignificance. Producing a clone of a human being would not amount to creating a carbon copyan automaton of the sort familiar from science fiction. It would be more likeproducing a delayed identical twin. And just as identical twins are two separatepeoplebiologically, psychologically, morally and legally, though notgeneticallyso a clone is a separate person from his or her non-contemporaneoustwin. To think otherwise is to embrace a belief in genetic determinismthe viewthat genes determine everything about us, and that environmental factors or therandom events in human development are utterly insignificant. The overwhelmingconsensus among geneticists is that genetic determinism is false. As geneticists have come to understand the ways in which genes operate, theyhave also become aware of the myriad ways in which the environment affects theirexpression. The genetic contribution to the simplest physical traits, such asheight and hair color, is significantly mediated by environmental factors. Andthe genetic contribution to the traits we value most deeply, from intelligenceto compassion, is conceded by even the most enthusiastic genetic researchers tobe limited and indirect. Indeed, we need only appeal to our ordinary experiencewith identical twinsthat they are different people despite their similaritiesto appreciate that genetic determinism is false. Furthermore, because of the extra steps involved, cloning will probably alwaysbe riskierthat is, less likely to result in a live birththan in vitrofertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. (It took more than 275 attempts beforethe researchers were able to obtain a successful sheep clone. While cloningmethods may improve, we should note that even standard IVF techniques typicallyhave a success rate of less than 20 percent.) So why would anyone go to thetrouble of cloning?There are, of course, a few reasons people might go to the trouble, and so itsworth pondering what they think they might accomplish, and what sort of ethicalquandaries they might engender. Consider the hypothetical example of the couplewho wants to replace a child who has died. The couple doesnt seek to haveanother child the ordinary way because they feel that cloning would enable themto reproduce, as it were, the lost child. But the unavoidable truth is that theywould be producing an entirely different person, a delay ed identical twin ofthat child. Once they understood that, it is unlikely they would persist. But suppose they were to persist? Of course we cant deny that possibility. Buta couple so persistent in refusing to acknowledge the genetic facts is notlikely to be daunted by ethical considerations or legal restrictions either. Ifour fear is that there could be many couples with that sort of psychology, thenwe have a great deal more than cloning to worry about. Another disturbing possibility is the person who wants a clone in order to haveacceptable spare parts in case he or she needs an organ transplant later inlife. But regardless of the reason that someone has a clone produced, the resultwould nevertheless be a human being with all the rights and protections thataccompany that status. It truly would be a disaster if the results of humancloning were seen as less than fully human. But there is certainly no moraljustification for and little social danger of that happening; after all, we donot accord lesser status to children who have been created through IVF or embryotransfer. .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .postImageUrl , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:hover , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:visited , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:active { border:0!important; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:active , .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31 .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ucc5ee7257c788ca0de87207563c45d31:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Who Do We Think We Are? EssayThere are other possibilities we could spin out. Suppose a couple wants adesigner childa clone of Cindy Crawford or Elizabeth Taylorbecause they wanta daughter who will grow up to be as attractive as those women. Indeed, supposesomeone wants a clone, never mind of whom, simply to enjoy the notoriety ofhaving one. We cannot rule out such cases as